NVIDIA · RTX 30
CompareYourGPU estimate, 100 = fastest card tracked
- VRAM
- 24 GB
- Power
- 450 W
- MSRP
- $1,999
The efficiency pick of the RDNA 4 range. It gives up some performance to the XT but drops 84 W of board power, and it keeps the full 16 GB memory pool, which is its main advantage over the similarly priced RTX 5070.
MSRP $549 USD
Good price
Idealo.es (ASUS RX 9070, 37 converging offers) · ES · new · price checked (40 days ago)
This price is getting old. It was last checked 5 weeks ago, and graphics card prices move week to week.
This price was checked on a specific listing, not necessarily the one linked below — treat Amazon’s own page as the authority on what it costs today.
CompareYourGPU may earn a commission on purchases made through these links. This never changes how a graphics card is scored or ranked.
En calidad de Afiliado de Amazon, obtengo ingresos por las compras adscritas que cumplen los requisitos aplicables
Should you buy it?
Generated from this card's own specifications and its standing against every other card CompareYourGPU tracks. Every line below is backed by a figure on this page.
Recommended
At $814 it is below the $1,409 its performance would justify, and it is among the stronger performers per dollar in the database.
4K gaming at 60+ FPS
Derived from this card's specifications, CompareYourGPU's estimated performance indices and its verified current price.
Noticeably slower than the XT for a small price difference
Estimated
How the card is expected to hold up at each resolution, and how it sits against the cards closest to it.
- Upper mid-range
150-215 FPS
Estimated, typical modern AAA game at High settings, no upscaling.
165+ FPS class16 GB gives real headroom at 1080p, including with ray tracing and high-resolution texture packs.
- Upper mid-range
100-145 FPS
Estimated, typical modern AAA game at High settings, no upscaling.
120+ FPS class16 GB gives real headroom at 1440p, including with ray tracing and high-resolution texture packs.
- Upper mid-range
50-70 FPS
Estimated, typical modern AAA game at High settings, no upscaling.
60+ FPS class16 GB gives real headroom at 4K, including with ray tracing and high-resolution texture packs.
Performance indices are aggregated from public review coverage, not measured by CompareYourGPU. Frame-rate ranges are modelled from those indices. How this is calculated.
CompareYourGPU estimate. 100 = the fastest card tracked.
CompareYourGPU estimate. Ray-traced performance does not track rasterisation performance, which is why it is charted separately.
Measured
Frame-rate figures transcribed from named third-party measurements, grouped so that two different test methodologies are never mixed in one table.
| Test | Average FPS | Share of fastest card tested |
|---|---|---|
| Rasteriser, 1080p | Not tested | — |
| Rasteriser, 1440p | 78.7 | 55.3% |
| Rasteriser, 4K | 47.4 | 47.9% |
| Ray tracing, 1440p | 72.6 | 59.3% |
Geometric mean of average FPS. Vendor upscaling at Quality (DLSS on GeForce, FSR on Radeon, XeSS on Arc), with native TAA in a minority of titles. Not native resolution, and not a like-for-like image-quality comparison across vendors.
The ray tracing rating covers a smaller 7-game suite than the 21-game rasteriser rating, so the two are not directly comparable with each other either. ComputerBase does not test every card at every resolution; a card missing from a table has no figure here rather than an inferred one.
Because of that, these figures are not directly comparable with the estimated index above, which describes native resolution with no upscaling. Read each on its own terms rather than against the other.
Test system: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Transcribed by CompareYourGPU on from ComputerBase.
No per-game frame-rate runs are recorded for this card yet, so the suite rating above is the only measured figure shown. How benchmark data is handled.
In the meantime, the game pages set out what makes each title demanding and which resolutions this class of card suits. Heavy titles worth checking: Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2, Hogwarts Legacy.
Manufacturer figures
Published by the manufacturer. Terms with a dotted underline can be expanded for a plain-English explanation.
What this card supports, and what each feature actually does for you.
Supported. This card uses 3rd-generation ray accelerators.
FSR 4, FSR 3.1, XeSS. Availability in any individual game depends on the developer implementing it.
FSR 3.1 Frame Generation, AMD Fluid Motion Frames 2 (driver-level). Frame generation raises the displayed frame rate without improving responsiveness, so it works best on top of an already playable frame rate.
Hardware AV1 encode is supported. AMD Radeon media engine with AV1, HEVC and H.264 encode. AV1, HEVC and H.264 decode.
CompareYourGPU's assessment, grounded in the specifications above rather than in marketing material.
What the card costs, what that price should be for the performance, and what it returns per dollar and per watt.
MSRP $549 USD
Idealo.es (ASUS RX 9070, 37 converging offers) · ES · new · price checked (40 days ago)
This price is getting old. It was last checked 5 weeks ago, and graphics card prices move week to week.
Good buy below $1,296 · expensive above $1,578
The fair price is where this card’s performance index falls on the price-to-performance line fitted across every card CompareYourGPU tracks. It describes the current market, it is not a recommendation, and it moves when prices do.
6.8
Performance index points per $100 at 1440p, calculated from the verified current price.
That places it in the upper half of the database on value.
25.0
Performance index points per 100 W of board power at 1440p.
That places it in the top quarter of the database on efficiency.
Record last edited . Specifications have not yet been re-checked against the manufacturer's own page in this pass.