Each guide explains a decision rather than reciting a specification sheet. Where a guide recommends products, the picks are pulled live from the GPU database using a stated ranking rule, so the advice and the data never drift apart.
Most graphics card advice starts with a list of products. This guide starts with the four questions that decide which list you should even be looking at, because a card that is perfect for one build is a waste of money in another.
This page ranks every in-production graphics card CompareYourGPU tracks on a blend of performance, memory, features and efficiency. The ranking is computed from the database, so it changes when the underlying data does.
1080p is the resolution where spending more stops paying off fastest. This ranking weights performance per dollar heavily, because at 1920x1080 the difference between a good card and an expensive one is often frames your monitor cannot display.
1440p is where most high-refresh gaming monitors sit, and where the price and performance curves meet most usefully. This ranking balances raw performance against memory headroom and value rather than optimising for any one of them.
4K is roughly 2.3 times the pixel count of 1440p, and it is unforgiving of a narrow memory bus or a small memory pool. This ranking weights 4K performance and VRAM heavily and excludes cards with under 12 GB of memory.
This ranking covers cards priced at $350 or below. At this end of the market the differences between products are large in percentage terms and small in absolute money, so a careful choice is worth more here than anywhere else in the range.
Ray tracing performance does not track rasterisation performance. Two cards that are evenly matched in a normal game can be far apart once ray tracing is enabled, which is why this ranking uses a separate index.