NVIDIA · RTX 50
CompareYourGPU estimate, 100 = fastest card tracked
- VRAM
- 8 GB
- Power
- 180 W
- MSRP
- $379
The cheapest 16 GB card in this database. Its 128-bit bus limits how far the memory advantage stretches, but for 1080p and light 1440p it removes VRAM from the list of things to worry about.
Launch MSRP. CompareYourGPU has no verified street price for this card, so this is a reference point rather than what it sells for today.
No retailer links are configured for this card yet. CompareYourGPU does not publish purchase links it cannot stand behind, so nothing is shown here rather than a button that goes nowhere.
Should you buy it?
Generated from this card's own specifications and its standing against every other card CompareYourGPU tracks. Every line below is backed by a figure on this page.
Recommended at the right price
At its $349 MSRP it would be below the $441 its performance justifies. CompareYourGPU has no verified street price, so confirm what it actually sells for before buying.
1440p gaming at 60+ FPS
Derived from this card's specifications, CompareYourGPU's estimated performance indices and launch MSRP. No verified current price is on record.
128-bit bus and 320 GB/s of bandwidth cap its ceiling
Estimated
How the card is expected to hold up at each resolution, and how it sits against the cards closest to it.
- Mid-range
95-135 FPS
Estimated, typical modern AAA game at High settings, no upscaling.
100+ FPS class16 GB gives real headroom at 1080p, including with ray tracing and high-resolution texture packs.
- Mid-range
60-85 FPS
Estimated, typical modern AAA game at High settings, no upscaling.
60+ FPS class16 GB gives real headroom at 1440p, including with ray tracing and high-resolution texture packs.
- Entry-level
25-40 FPS
Estimated, typical modern AAA game at High settings, no upscaling.
Below 60 FPS natively16 GB gives real headroom at 4K, including with ray tracing and high-resolution texture packs.
Performance indices are aggregated from public review coverage, not measured by CompareYourGPU. Frame-rate ranges are modelled from those indices. How this is calculated.
CompareYourGPU estimate. 100 = the fastest card tracked.
CompareYourGPU estimate. Ray-traced performance does not track rasterisation performance, which is why it is charted separately.
Measured
Frame-rate figures transcribed from named third-party measurements, grouped so that two different test methodologies are never mixed in one table.
| Test | Average FPS | Share of fastest card tested |
|---|---|---|
| Rasteriser, 1080p | 82.7 | 96.6% |
| Rasteriser, 1440p | 53.5 | 37.6% |
| Rasteriser, 4K | Not tested | — |
| Ray tracing, 1440p | 49.6 | 40.5% |
Geometric mean of average FPS. Vendor upscaling at Quality (DLSS on GeForce, FSR on Radeon, XeSS on Arc), with native TAA in a minority of titles. Not native resolution, and not a like-for-like image-quality comparison across vendors.
The ray tracing rating covers a smaller 7-game suite than the 21-game rasteriser rating, so the two are not directly comparable with each other either. ComputerBase does not test every card at every resolution; a card missing from a table has no figure here rather than an inferred one.
Because of that, these figures are not directly comparable with the estimated index above, which describes native resolution with no upscaling. Read each on its own terms rather than against the other.
Test system: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Transcribed by CompareYourGPU on from ComputerBase.
No verified benchmark data yet
CompareYourGPU only publishes frame-rate figures it can attribute to a named, linkable measurement, and none have been transcribed for the RX 9060 XT 16GB yet. The estimated performance indices above are clearly labelled as estimates and are the honest alternative until measured runs are recorded here.
In the meantime, the game pages set out what makes each title demanding and which resolutions this class of card suits. Heavy titles worth checking: Cyberpunk 2077, Red Dead Redemption 2, Hogwarts Legacy.
Reserved advertising space. No advertising network is connected yet, so nothing is served here.
Manufacturer figures
Published by the manufacturer. Terms with a dotted underline can be expanded for a plain-English explanation.
What this card supports, and what each feature actually does for you.
Supported. This card uses 3rd-generation ray accelerators.
FSR 4, FSR 3.1, XeSS. Availability in any individual game depends on the developer implementing it.
FSR 3.1 Frame Generation, AMD Fluid Motion Frames 2 (driver-level). Frame generation raises the displayed frame rate without improving responsiveness, so it works best on top of an already playable frame rate.
Hardware AV1 encode is supported. AMD Radeon media engine with AV1, HEVC and H.264 encode. AV1, HEVC and H.264 decode.
CompareYourGPU's assessment, grounded in the specifications above rather than in marketing material.
What the card costs, what that price should be for the performance, and what it returns per dollar and per watt.
Launch MSRP. CompareYourGPU has no verified street price for this card, so this is a reference point rather than what it sells for today.
Good buy below $406 · expensive above $494
The fair price is where this card’s performance index falls on the price-to-performance line fitted across every card CompareYourGPU tracks. It describes the current market, it is not a recommendation, and it moves when prices do. Calculated from launch MSRP across the database, because no verified street prices are on record.
9.5
Performance index points per $100 at 1440p, calculated from launch MSRP.
That places it in the top quarter of the database on value.
20.6
Performance index points per 100 W of board power at 1440p.
That places it in the upper half of the database on efficiency.
Record last edited . Specifications have not yet been re-checked against the manufacturer's own page in this pass.